9/13/10
6 quotes
Beck, Alan and Aaron Katcher. Between Pets and People. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 1996.
I chose this quote because it basically states what I want to accomplish with my art.
“The name of the animal is linked to the owner in the same way that a snapshot is. Jay Ruby, an anthropologist who studied the logic of home photography, noted that family photographs are rarely meaningful in themselves. Instead they are used as keys to family narratives: ‘That was when Uncle Tom visited us just before Vera got married, and we were eating on the terrace just after coming back from the wedding rehearsal,’ or ‘That’s Mother outside of the cathedral Amiens with the hat she got at the outdoor market that morning.’ The pet’s name and the home photograph are linked to us by specific associations, while human names are linked to us by general associations.”
Beck, Alan and Aaron Katcher. Between Pets and People. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 1996.
I thought it was interesting that photography and the snapshot were referenced in a book on pet keeping.
“Surely the most important role our pets play in our lives is that they love us. No person is too old or ugly or poor or disabled to win the love of a pet- they love us uncritically and without reserve… Not surprisingly, many of us admit our pets into the most intimate areas of our lives. We are not in the least embarrassed when a dog sees us in the shower or overhears an argument. In this, a companion animal provides an intimacy that exceeds any we may experience with virtually any other human being, including our spouses and children; the intimacy is on a par with that of mother and newborn infant, or of our skins. A dear friend once expressed this feeling beautifully. Se had been resting on her couch with her dog, and as she looked into his eyes, it seemed to her that she and he could give each other transfusions if necessary, that their very blood must be compatible.”
Beck, Alan and Aaron Katcher. Between Pets and People. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 1996.
The fact that a your pet could be your most intimate relationship is a startling statement at first but if you really think about it makes some sense. Even with our closest family members we usually aren’t comfortable revealing embarrassing things about ourselves but with our pets, it doesn’t even seem to phase us. Is it the only relationship that can truly be nonjudgmental?
“What I have discovered is that the history of pet keeping is an integral part of the history of everyday life in the United States. It is connected to changing ideas about human nature, emotional life, individual responsibility, and our society’s obligations to all kinds of dependent others, including people. Pet keeping is an important part of the history of childhood in America, and it speaks to evolving ideas about the proper roles of men and women and the historical characteristics of the modern American middle classes.”
Grier, Katherine C.. Pets In America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006.
There is a significant history to pet keeping, which is worth exploring. The changes in our attitudes and actions towards pets over the centuries do say something about our society. It does reveal a lot about our class, gender roles, community, industrial and commercial development, and capitalist/consumer society. It’s even a part of the story of government, public health, and philanthropy.
“ The psychologist Damon, states that in societies where the family has been
eroded by mobility, ‘friendship replaces kinship in establishing relations between persons based on positive feeling, trust and other non-tangible manifestations of
affection,’”
Serpell, James. In the Company of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.
Perhaps we don’t stop and think about how mobility in our modern society affects us. But it makes sense that when mobility increases our kinship bonds decrease. But the need for close, trusting relationships is still present. Pets have been able to fill that void for many in an almost perfect way.
“The World Health Organization defines health as: ‘A state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.’ To have a life worth living, you need to connect to those around you and contribute to their lives. This is where the Bond plays such a crucial role. At a time when psychology, sociology, and politics have sucked the spontaneity out of human relations, the simplicity of our affection with pets is a model for the smaller, intimate moments that really sustain us. Without those ties that bind—the bonds of love, friendship, responsibility, and dependence—we gradually begin to wither away. It is our bonds that keep us healthy . . .”
Becker, Marty. The Healing Power of Pets. New York: Hyperion, 2002.
This reiterates how important relationships are to our health.
9/12/10
Monday 9/13/10





Valerie Shaff
Artist Bio
Valerie Shaff was given her first camera when she was seven years old. Photography has since become her career. Her work has appeared in many popular publications such as the New Yorker, Paper, Good Housekeeping, and Martha Sterwart Living. Valerie is best known for her sepia toned portraits of dogs. Her 1998 collaboration with Roy Blount, Jr., If Only You Knew How Much I Smell You/True Portraits of Dogs was such a success that more have followed of puppies, barn yard animals and now, cats.
She is equally skilled at capturing the essence of other animals, places and people, too. Her work of Silent Pioneers - 13 Portraits of Gay Activists appeared in Out magazine. She describes herself as having a "romantic vision" and says she seeks "truth in both subjects and beauty." Her commercial clients include the Gap, Ralph Lauren, Vintage Press and Atlantic Records. She is the recipient of a Polaroid Corporation grant and her work is in the corporate collections of Polaroid and Colgate Palmolive.
"canine measure somewhere between ordered and free."
Blount Jr., Roy. I Am Puppy, Hear Me Yap. HarperCollins Publishers. New York, 2000.
"... people still keep dogs and cherish them, pet photographers run thriving businesses..., producing portraits which take their place within family iconography... In her (Shaff) remarkable series of studio portraits, we can glimpse the dedication of their owners..."
Williams, Val. New Natural History. National Museum of Photography, Film and Television. Bradford, England, 1999.
Editorial Reviews of : If Only You Knew How Much I Smell You: True Portraits of Dogs
Amazon.com Review:
Review:
Man's best friend, but what exactly goes through a dog's mind when he looks at us? Photographer Valerie Shaff and American humourist Roy Blount Jr. have joined forces to produce a book every dog lover should have. From the pertinent to the poignant, the farcical to the fancy, terriers, hounds and everything in-between are impeccably captured on film and in word. In play or portrait, Shaff's snapshots capture the marvellous range of looks that can cross our canine friend's faces while Blount succinctly encapsulates the dogs mind from simple two liners to longer verse. A must for all dog fans, with humorous and in some cases hilarious slants on their emotions as seen by humans. And anyway, who can resist that longing look emanating from the book jacket? - Lucy WatsonCarrie Haddad Gallery
http://www.valerieshaff.com/
9/8/10
9/8/10 Thursday Blog

Are Animals People?
The disparity between experiments that suggest sophisticated cognition in animals and those that find hard limits to animal intelligence has created a debate over animal “personhood.”
Animal Intelligence
"Until a landmark paper [pdf] by Erich Jarvis and colleagues in 2005, the answer to this question had been a resounding yes! Look at a mammalian brain and you are struck by the multiple folds of the massive cerebral cortex. Bird brains, it was said, don’t have such a cortex. Hence, their cognitive capacity should be extremely limited. This, essentially, was the argument I had faced through three decades of work with Alex. He was not supposed to be able to name objects and categories, understand “bigger” and “smaller,” “same” and “different,” because his was a bird brain. But, of course, Alex did do such things. I knew that Alex was proving a profound truth: brains may look different, and there may be a spectrum of ability that is determined by anatomical details, but brains and intelligence are a universally shared trait in nature—the capacity varies, but the building blocks are the same." - Irene M. Pepperberg
http://discovermagazine.com/2009/feb/20-think-animals-dont-think-like-us-think-again
Spain Gives Great Apes Legal Rights:
"On June 25 the Spanish Parliament’s environmental committee approved a resolution to grant legal rights to great apes, covering chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans. The resolution, expected to be enacted into law by June 2009, gives great apes the right to life and protects them from harmful research practices and exploitation for profit, such as use in films, commercials, and circuses." - Apoorva Mandavillihttp://discovermagazine.com/2009/jan/064
So while many animals display remarkable cognitive abilities, there are clearly limits to what they can do. Does this mean they aren’t entitled to be considered “non-human persons?” Is it even appropriate to judge non-human animals in such anthropomorphic terms? Suppose we decide it’s wrong to keep an orca in captivity because of its intelligence. Then what about a slightly less-intelligent animal like a pig or a dog? Where do you draw the line? These questions are still up for debate.
How smart is man's best friend?
The Pooch IQ Kit: $49.99
This references the issues addressed in JeongMee Yoon's Zoo series which I posted on Monday. Is it wrong to keep them captives because of their intelligence? Is it wrong to keep animals in captivity period? Where do you draw the line?
9/6/10
Monday Blog 9/6





http://www.jeongmeeyoon.com/aw_zoo.htm
Zoo series
ARTIST STATEMENT:
Part 1:
Through photographing animals and enclosures in zoos I try to compare the social structure and classification of zoos to those of human's in this dreary society. Animals in zoos are rather surviving while they have forgotten their own animal instinct because they are kept in this apparatus which human devised for the educational purpose like botanical gardens, art museums, natural history museum, and libraries. Though men created various customs, institutions and ideologies for their ideal lives, it is ourselves that are restricted from the system we create. I see contemporaries who are under the fine network of state's subtle surveillance system adjusting themselves without notice when I watch these wild animals used-to-be. Now they are the animals that lost their animal instinct, animals have no control over their own lives, and animals living in the environment without knowing if they are in the real nature or in an artificial environment.
PART 2:
People made values, rules, systems, ideologies and so on, in order to live comfortably and to reach an ideal world. But those things restrained us from freely living, and aroused the excluding. Unfortunately they were increasingly aggravating the alienation. Many people are supposed to have experienced the inconsistent and unreasonable situations in the world. The animals in the Zoo are in the same conditions as us. They need to live a natural and unreserved life in nature. But we put them behind the bars, so that they lose their inherent haracters. I didn`t supposed they lived a true life. Just on that point I started the series of the zoological photos. In my early works, I revolved on the simple idea, but more I took the At last, I asked myself anew what on earth the Zoo is.
This question had me think about what the Zoo presented and hid, that is to say issues of visibility and invisibility. We can see the animals and confirm their names to which we are accustomed in the photos of illustrations of the fairly tails. At the Zoo, we recognize the similarity between the human and animals of discover the differences between them and us. And sometimes, we have a sense of our own superiority to them, even so being ignorant of it. The Zoo is like those of the House of trees and plants, Museums, galleries, Libraries and so forth at the role and the function. All of them belong to the institutions of reproducing the fixed ideologies of the established societies.
In the Zoo, some animals are locked in the cage and lose their inherence, others are under the care, because they are injured. All of them don`t have the power to change their situations, so that they are thrown in back of the bars and remains in the artificial space of the Zoo. And besides they don`t know that the artificial space of the Zoo is the fake circumstances. They remind me of the contemporaries who uncritically accept the present systems
and are increasingly insensible to the simulative life.
And I observed the mechanism that the spatial disposition of the Zoo arouses. The history of the Zoo says only sight could dominate and control the placement of the cages. By the way I recognize that the placement of the cages in the Zoo is homologous to that of the prison. This relation is closely associated with our society, Being blind to the fact that we are under the control of something or someone.
To embossing such ideas in the photos of the Zoo, I have tried to demonstrate the deserted Zoo and the wounded animals. I have maximized the artificial empty space of the cage or closed up the hurt animals, which remind me of the staggering contemporaries.
REVIEW: (see bold for influential ideas)
JeongMee Yoon's black and white photos have our gazes wandering somewhere in-between animals and their habitats which is zoo. The state of wandering is generally perceived as a psychological reaction to a certain kind of deficiency or absence. Different from ordinary zoos with extravaganzas of curious people in festive mood and cute tricks of animals, the zoo in Yoon's photos suggests such dreadful scenes as an empty cage shown through the iron bars, a cement floor soaked with animal blood, and some animals barely resting on the corner, which evokes dreary yet hollow sentiment.
The space called zoo suddenly struck as a representation of wearisome and eeriness. At the same time, the zoo as a tangible space to store animals begins to draw more attention than the animals themselves. Animals in the photos provoke a feeling of sadness and isolation rather than that of affection or intimacy; the photos of an elephant with one ivory broken, an one-eyed owl, a gorilla leaning head on the window, and stuffed animals with kitsch paintings on the background. The images in Yoon's photos have certain remoteness from what we generally believe about zoo and animals. You may find your naive belief become fractured and finally break down in pieces. Indeed, all the images tend to open up our stereotypical perception and teach us how to look at them in different perspectives by making a hole or crack onto our firm believes. Rather strange and even surreal images of the zoo give us a chill: Gazing into it for a moment, you might find it reminiscent of an empty stage or a cell in jail. Considering zoo as a specimen room of living creatures, doesn't it indeed explicate the human history of imprudent killing over animals and of constant subjugation and captivity? What Jeongmee Yoon ultimately attempts to suggest in the series of zoo photos would be the multi-faceted aspects of a space called zoo.
What really is the zoo for? Yoon's photo starts from this question. Her photos may seem like a critical view or a comment on zoo. Why have people created zoos at the first place? What are the functions, structures and the spatial layouts of the zoo like? It must hold strong similarity to fundamentals of human society, such as authority systems, isolations and controls, discriminations and exclusions, and captivities and disciplines. What do we actually expect from zoo? This question is not only applicable to a particular place like zoo, but the same yet very complex question can also be valid for our lives the origins and fundamentals of our so-called modern life. Also, it leads us to a somewhat self-reflective and existential state. What is human and what is animal? Is there a clear distinction between the two? Aren't we also a fragile creature raised and disciplined to be suitable for the human society? Then, would that be rational person or what? Would that be just a matter of social system? Is there anyone completely free from systems or institutions? I suddenly realized that I have gotten obsessed with different questions evoked while looking at Yoon's photos. This kind of obsession can be a bit overwhelming sometimes. But each time we see images, we ended up facing with complex yet inevitable questions.
As for small kids, zoo can be a place full of fun and excitement. In the past, school excursions or children's day used to be the rare occasions to visit zoo. We had so much fun watching animals back then.Why do we relate zoos with festivals or special events? Human-beings indeed have long history of celebrating rituals in conjunction with shooting and hunting. It certainly has something to do with animals: People circled around the hunted animals and enjoyed dancing, and they even made stone inscriptions with animal images wishing for further luck in hunting. They say that the Chinese character beauty took the image from a lamb offered in sacrifice, which reflects nomadic culture and life where lamb had been the most important food source. Since then, human have learned to fight with animals and cultivate them in order to establish and maintain their own society and culture. With beginning of modern society, human science and technology facilitated the precise capture and butchery of animals. Furthermore, people categorized animals in coherent order for thorough control and management, which resulted in pictorial books, encyclopedia, specimen collections, and biology studies. And the zoo is the essential representation of all the history between human and animals. The zoos are the outcome of modern age. The underlying purpose of zoo and the time of its establishment coincide with other institutions as museums, libraries, and botanical gardens. The emergence of modern capitalism in 19th century and accordingly emerged notion of weekends triggered the birth of zoo an artificial, manipulated and fabricated nature. Zoo shows bloody evidence of human-beings desire to dominate nature and pursue for colonialism as they accumulated wealth and became more materialistic. The engaged animals, barely continuing their pathetic lives, became an object of delight for human-beings. Now, the animals deprived of their instincts, memories about nature, and their origins exist before us as a piece of specimen or as a representative of each species.
JeongMee Yoon has always focused on specific structures or sites taken them as a subject of her works, and her concerns about zoo lies on the extension. It seems like there is not so much difference between spatial structure of a zoo and the human residences. Yoon gradually became paid more attention and time on the subject zoo and produced a series of photos regarding it.
The zoo located next to an amusement park or a museum is a place fully sacrificed itself for the purpose of entertaining human-beings. It appears to be an ideal place where human and nature co-exists in peace, but deep inside, there lurks a history of power and control, invasion and plunder. There exists a certain distance between the caged animals and myself. The distance marked by the iron bars of the cage makes me feel secured and feel overwhelmed with superiority to those encaged creatures. Some kids would throw their snacks or small stones with innocent laughs. What a great place to realize how advanced we are as supreme creatures!
Wasn't it that the idea of human supremacy and controls and possessions in the name of justice has always been the essential principle of Western countries and their Christian perspective? What Westerners have believed (liberating human beings from nature through the development of technology and science) became the fundamentals of modernization and our modern life. However, it also triggered the beginning of the devastation of all living creature, including nature and human-beings. Zoo reflects this bitter reality in helpless manner. Yoon's photos are also on the extension of unveiling the underlying meaning of zoo; her black and white photos contain the long history of human beings and animals. How could it be possible for the photo to unveil a fragment of the dark history, which is hardly exposed on the surface?
- Park, Young-Taek (Art critic, Prof. at Kyung-gi Univ.)BIO:
1969 Born in Seoul, South Korea
Education
2006 Graduated from Department of Photography, Video and related Media, School of Visual Arts(M.F.A.), NY, USA
1999 Graduated from Department of Photographic Design, Hong-Ik Univ. (M.F.A), South Korea
1992 Graduated from Department of Painting, College of Fine Arts, Seoul National University (B.F.A), South Korea
2008-2009 Changdong Studio Program, Seoul, South Korea
2006 International Studio & Curatorial Program (ISCP), New York, USA
2002 Ssamzie Space Studio Program, Seoul, South Korea
Solo Exhibition
2009 The Pink & Blue Project (Paris-Beijing Photo Gallery, Beijing, China)
2009 The Pink & Blue Project (Bolinas Museum, CA, USA)
2009 The Pink & Blue Project (San Francisco International Airport Museum (SFO Airport Museum), SF, CA, USA)
2009 The Pink & Blue Project (Jenkins Johnson gallery, San Francisco, CA, USA)
2009 The Pink & Blue Project (EM Art Gallery, Seoul, South Korea)
2008 The Pink & Blue Project (Children's Museum of the Arts, NY, USA)
2008 The Pink & Blue Project (Jenkins Johnson Gallery, New York, USA)
2008 The Pink & Blue Project (La Caja Blanca Gallery, Spain)
2007 5th Daum Prize Solo Show - The Pink & Blue Project (Kumho Museum, Seoul, South Korea)
-Supported by Geonhi Art Foundation
2001 Natural History Museum (Gallery Boda, Seoul, South Korea)
-NokUmBangChoBunKiTaengChon Solo Invited Exhibition
2000 Zoo II (Time Photo Space, South Korea)
1999 Zoo (Gallery Boda, Seoul, South Korea)
Teaching
2008 Seoul National University, Seoul Institute of the Arts, Hongik University, South Korea
2007 Seoul National University, South Korea
1999-2004 Photography Department, Seoul National Univ. of Technology, Sungshin Univ.,
Sejong Univ. Hanyang Univ., Dongguk Univ., Kyungwon Univ. Semyung Univ., Korea
Jenkins Johnson Gallery, NY & San Fransisco
With pets, our homes, fenced in yards, vet offices, kennels, etc. have become places to store domesticated animals. The spaces and resources we devote to our pets can become most interesting aspect of the pet/animal relationship. They have been striped of nearly all instinct and are not encouraged to embrace the true animals that they are. Pet cats sit indoors, on window seals, powerless to change their situations, gazing outside at squirrels and birds, longing to stalk and chase after potential prey and be wild. Living in a world where humans have been stripped away from nature, perhaps pet keeping is, in a remote, odd, and subconscious way, a method to reconnect with nature, even if it is in a very controlled manner.
9/1/10
Thursday Blog 9/2/10
Woman in her living room with show poodles, Auburn, NH, 2002 by Sage SohierRECREATION
"Leisure involves pleasure with reference to nothing else. Pleasure comes from leisure's being already at its end, in both modern senses: leisure has no goal but itself; and it drives forward to nothing else. It is a state, not a process, in our speech; it is practice, not production; governed by prudence, not by art, in his speech. It is hard to keep from identifying it with happiness, instead of simply associating them as he does." -Christopher Berry Gray from Philosophy of Man at Recreation and Leisure
"Its not enough. But what is enough? Everyone draws the line somewhere else... We have people here who believe their impression's more authentic than somebody else's because they have fleas... I draw the line at what the public sees and perceives." -Civil War Reenactors from Simulated Worlds aired on This American Life
Is pet keeping a hobby, recreational activity or something more? Is it a lifestyle? Is it even optional for some? Is the pet just another "interest" to add to our Facebook page? Is it a member of the family? Is it possible to take pet keeping too far? If so, where do you draw the line?
Simulated Worlds (podcast)
Gray, Peter Berry. Philosophy of Man at Recreation and Leisure. Peter Lang Publishing. New York, 2007.
In Philosophy of Man at Recreation and Leisure, Christopher Berry Gray identifies worldviews that welcome or reject activities of recreation and leisure. Gray rigorously examines the many dimensions of the human being, such as bodiliness, animation, mentality, morality, sociality, and spirituality. By doing so, he discloses the many activities that embody, exemplify, and reveal the human being. Philosophy of Man at Recreation and Leisure is essential reading for courses on recreation and leisure studies and philosophical anthropology.
8/30/10
6 Books 8/30/10
Faber Kolb, Arianne. Jan Brueghel the Elder: The Entry of Animals into Noah’s Ark. Getty Publications. Los Angeles, 2005.
Brueghel popularized the “paradise landscape,” a new subgenre of landscape painting in the early seventeenth century, which typically represents episodes from Genesis. In Brugehel’s works, numerous exotic and native European species coexist harmoniously in a lush landscape setting. And unlike his predecessors, who emphasized man’s sin, Brueghel invites the viewer to celebrate the beauty and variety of God’s creations. The biblical story of Noah’s Ark could be argued to emphasize the importance of animals’ existence. Instead of saving all of mankind, God saved Noah and his family and two of every single species of animals. The coexistence of/relationship between man and animals is more significant than some may want to believe it to be.
Gates of Heaven. Dir. Errrol Morris. IFC Films, 1978. DVD.
The signs on the pets’ grave markers are eloquent in their way. ``I knew love; I knew this dog.'' ``Dog is God spelled backwards.'' ``For saving my life.'' Morris explores a subject that makes you want to laugh and cry simultaneously. These animal lovers are expressing the deepest of human needs, for love and companionship. ``When I turn my back,'' says Floyd McClure, ``I don't know you, not truly. But I can turn my back on my little dog, and I know that he's not going to jump on me or bite me; but human beings can't be that way.'' Questions that come to mind after watching this film: Is he making fun of those people? Are people ridiculous for caring so much about animals? The film is a put-on, right? It can't really be true?
Grier, Katherine. Pets In America. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill, 2006.
Grier describes the changing cultural sensibilities that have defined the experience of American pet owners from colonial times to the present. She focuses on human-animal relationships and articulates why pets matter. It is connected to changing ideas about human nature, emotional life, individual responsibility and our society’s obligations to all kinds of dependent others. For many of us, pet keeping is the only one-on-one relationship we have left to animals. Many American pet owners share the conviction that pet animals are distinct individuals and their uniqueness should be celebrated.
Hugo, Pieter. The Hyena & Other Men. Prestel Publishing. Munich, 2007.
“I realized that what I found fascinating was the hybridization of the urban and the wild, and the paradoxical relationship that the handlers have with their animals- sometimes doting and affectionate, sometimes brutal and cruel…. I look back at the notebooks I had kept while with them. The words ‘dominance’, ‘codependence’, and ‘submission’ kept appearing. The motifs that linger are the fraught relationships we have with ourselves, with animals and with nature.”
Leal, Brigitte and Simon, Joan. Alexander Calder: The Paris Years 1926-1933. Yale University Press. New Haven, 2008.
For as long as there have been circuses, artists have taken as subjects their performers and their dazzling, often suspenseful, acts. Georges Seurat, Edgar Degas, and Picasso, among others, depicted circuses in Europe; Edward Hopper, George Luks, and John Sloan, did so in the United States. Though Calder had previously painted and drawn the circus, his miniature Circus was something far different: he performed it. Serving as narrator and puppeteer in this early example of performance art, Calder presented his Circus act-by-act in a precise order. The ringmaster (the mainly wire-and-cloth Mr. Loyal) opened the show by welcoming the audience and blowing his whistle. Calder’s version of the contemporary circus’s Roman chariot race served as its finale. ”There is always a feeling of perpetual motion about animals and to draw them successfully this must be borne in mind.” Calder knew how to capture the essence of an animal. There is a primal motion and performance to his circus and animal works. He understood the differences between humans and animals.
Martel, Yann. Beatrice and Virgil: A Novel. Spiegel and Graue. New York, 2010.
“I often get asked the question why I use animals in my stories. Life of Pi was set in a zoo and featured a number of animals, and animals once again play a prominent role in my new novel, Beatrice and Virgil. Am I a great animal lover? Well, I suppose I am; nature is indeed beautiful. But the actual reason I like to use animals is because they help me tell my tale. People are cynical about people, but less so about wild animals. A rhinoceros dentist elicits less skepticism, in some ways, than a German dentist. I also use animals in my fiction because people rarely see animals as they truly are, biologically. Rather, they tend to project human traits onto them, seeing nobility in one species, cowardice in another, and so on. This is biological nonsense, of course; every species is and behaves as it needs to in order to survive. But this animal-as-canvas quality is useful for a storyteller. It means that an animal that people feel kindly towards becomes a character that readers feel kindly towards.” -Yann Martel on Animals and the Holocaust in Beatrice and Virgil.
Shay, Art. Animals. University of Illinois. Urbana, 2002.
Shooting animal pictures that transcend ordinary human or bestial behavior is often a test of one’s own character: Do I shoot the picture or get involved? In Freud’s view, famously enlisted by Scott F. Fitzgerald, one test of sanity is being able to hold two opposing ideas in mind yet continue to function. (Referring to image on pg. 108.) Shay avoids the “cutes” while still displaying humans imitating animals. Shay, “we imitate those we love and they imitate us.” Shay illuminates the shameless extent to which people will go for their animals and reveals the lives some chose to share with animals. (See pg. 9, 55, 25, 87)
Monday Blog 8/30/10




Pieter Hugo
Hugo's series Hyena & Other Men really spoke to me about domestication, dominance, codependence, and submission. I think his work relates to mine due to the pride and shamelessness the owners of the hyena and baboons display. As well as their attempts to domesticate or train these wild animals and make them submissive to their power. There is a play on affection and doting vs. brutality and cruelty.
BIOGRAPHY
Pieter Hugo was born in 1976 and grew up in Cape Town, where he continues to live. He underwent a two-year residency in 2002-3 at Fabrica in Treviso, Italy. Recent solo shows have taken place at Yossi Milo Gallery in New York (2010); Le Chateau d'Eau in Toulouse, France (2010); the Australian Centre for Photography in Sydney, Australia (2009), and Foam_Fotografiemuseum Amsterdam (2008). Group exhibitions include The Endless Renaissance, Bass Museum of Art, Miami Beach, Florida (2009); Street & Studio: An urban history of photography at Tate Modern, London (2008); An Atlas of Events at Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, Lisbon (2007); and the 27th São Paulo Bienal (2006). He won first prize in the Portraits section of the 2006 World Press Photo competition, and was the Standard Bank Young Artist for Visual Art in 2007. In 2008 Hugo was the winner of the KLM Paul Huf Award and the Arles Discovery Award at the Rencontres d'Arles Photography Festival in France.
QUOTES
"Although each group stands as a unique subculture, both encapsulate man’s exploitative relationship with nature, as well as the tenuous, and often dangerous, existence of those who occupy the margins of the global economy."
Read more: http://newyork.timeout.com/articles/art/25452/pieter-hugo-the-hyena-and-other-men#ixzz0y7ehneZV
Moral questions arise. Do Mr. Hugo's pictures exoticize ''the other?'' Do they condone the mistreatment of animals? It is partly that disquieting feeling of flirting with the forbidden that makes these photographs so hard to look away from.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A06E1DF1339F93BA15751C1A9619C8B63
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTWtrKd5biA
GALLERIES
MICHAEL STEVENSON GALLERY
Ground floor, Buchanan Building, 160 Sir Lowry Road, Woodstock, 7925, Cape Town, ZA
T: +27 21 462 1500
YOSSI MILO GALLERY
525 West 25th Street,New York, NY 10001, USA
T: +1 212 414 0370
GALLERIA EXTRASPAZIO
via San Francesco di Sales 16/a, I - 00165, Roma, Italy
T: +39 06 682 10655
COKKIE SNOEI
Mauritsweg 55, 3012 JX Rotterdam
T: +31 10 41 29 274
T: +31 20 42 33 807
WEBSITE:
http://www.pieterhugo.com/
