9/29/10

9/30/10 Thursday








Carl Jung and Projection

Projection, according to Carl Jung, occurs when a person sees in another qualities they themselves possess. This phenomenon goes on daily in most relationships and encounters.

Whenever a person is convinced that the awful qualities seen in another person have nothing to do with him or herself, a projection is mostly likely being engaged. This does not mean, however, that these qualities are not present. It merely means that they probably exist, to some extent, in the person observing them.

Intimate Relationships

A person projects onto another whatever it is they need them to be. Regarding intimate relationship, the inner feminine/anima or inner masculine /animus is seen expressed in the other. That person to whom one is fervently attracted, therefore, is none other than the outer mirror for that person's inner self. The Beloved holds the space, so to speak, for what that person seeks inside themselves.

Understanding the difference between what is true and what is only projection can be a challenge. If a person or group of people has really “gotten under our skin” or the person or situation or thing really “gets to us,” that person is most likely caught up in a projection or spell of some kind. Likewise, that feeling of falling in love, albeit glorious, may be mere projection.

Why Do We Keep Pets?

Article by Sam Vaknin, Ph.D. from globalpolitician.com November 10, 2008.

"The presence of pets activates in us two primitive psychological defense mechanisms: projection and narcissism."

"Projection is a defense mechanism intended to cope with internal or external stressors and emotional conflict by attributing to another person or object (such as a pet) - usually falsely - thoughts, feelings, wishes, impulses, needs, and hopes deemed forbidden or unacceptable by the projecting party.

In the case of pets, projection works through anthropomorphism: we attribute to animals our traits, behavior patterns, needs, wishes, emotions, and cognitive processes. This perceived similarity endears them to us and motivates us to care for our pets and cherish them."

von Franz, Marie-Louise. Projection and Re-Collection in Jungian Psychology: Reflections of the Soul (Reality of the Psyche Series). Open Court Publishers. Chicago, 1995.

The idea of projection onto pets is an area I haven't really examined in my work. It does seem rather obvious to me that it is present in the pet-human relationship. I think we do long to see human characteristics in our pets. This does increase their attractiveness to us. However, I wouldn't go as far as Dr. Vaknin and attach narcissism to the relationship.

9/26/10

9/27/10 Monday





Colleen Rudolf

http://www.colleenrudolf.com/

"There are a lot of dogs represented in these drawings, and in the painting section. I find the relationship between human and canine to function as a synthesis of larger issues; such as evolution, behavioral science, cognitive science, cross species communication and adaptation.

This made the shelter dog of particular interest. Reasons sited for surrendering of companion animals are often behavioral and are as a result of a dog who is misunderstood. I see this as a direct result of the extreme egocentrism that humans practice."

Artist Statement

My work focuses on natural forms and systems, both figurative and non-figurative. There is a sense of play through both choice of materials, process and subjects depicted. I see my work as collaborative and my job to assemble parts into a whole that effectively communicates my own critical perception of the world around me. I am interested in the environmental context of the work and I see the human experience greatly enhanced by the process of making things and experimentation.

Biography
Colleen Rudolf is a sculptor, painter, public installation artist and new media explorer. Born in 1981 in New York City, she later earned her undergraduate degree from Skidmore College in 2003 with departmental honors in Fine Art. After three years of traveling and working, she decided to refine her practice and earned a graduate degree from the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts in 2008 where she was awarded the Fellowship Juried Prize honorable mention and the Justine Cretella Memorial Scholarship. She currently works out of her studio in Philadelphia, PA.

Isn't currently represented by any gallery.

Review: http://theartblog.org/2010/04/shapes-and-animals-at-tiger-and-grizzly/

"Rudolf has constructed an interactive installation where the audience is encouraged to participate and be a determining factor in the work’s life. Consisting predominantly of sculptural objects, the included pieces attempt to explore various methods of communication. Using the animal kingdom and modern technology as inspiration, the viewer is challenged to consider exactly what it means to “connect” to another entity."

Colvin, Vincent. "CON⠂NECT" Colleen Rudolf. http://grizzlygrizzly.wordpress.com/2010/03/30/connect-kuh-nekt-colleen-rudolf/ 30 March 2010.

"Rudolf is both perceptive and playful in contrasting animals’ straightforward and instinctual manner of relating to each other with humans’ inability to give our full attention to any single interaction. Rudolf believes that humans’ lack of focus is a recent development, due to the barrage of technological communication to which we are increasingly exposed.

The theme of Rudolf’s exhibit is illustrated most clearly in a series of three works on pedestals. On one pedestal is A Moment, a delicately wrought sculpture of two penguins facing each other. On the pedestal on the opposite end is Cellular Phones, two cell phones standing so close together that they, too, seem to be huddled in intimacy."

Kantor, Becca. Shapes and Animals at Tiger and Grizzly. http://theartblog.org/2010/04/shapes-and-animals-at-tiger-and-grizzly/ 11 April 2010.

Intimacy


Word: Intimacy

Definition: 1. the state of being intimate. 2. a close, familiar, and usually affectionate or loving personal relationship with another person or group. 3. a close association with or detailed knowledge or deep understanding of a place, subject, period of history, etc.: an intimacy with Japan. 4. an act or expression serving as a token of familiarity, affection, or the like: to allow the intimacy of using first names. 5. an amorously familiar act; liberty. 6. sexual intercourse. 7. the quality of being comfortable, warm, or familiar: the intimacy of the room. 8. privacy, esp. as suitable to the telling of a secret: in the intimacy of his studio.



Quote 1: “Not surprisingly, many of us admit our pets into the most intimate areas of our lives. We are not in the least embarrassed when a dog sees us in the shower or overhears an argument. In this, a companion animal provides an intimacy that exceeds any we may experience with virtually any other human beings, including our spouses and children, the intimacy is on par with that of mother and newborn infant, or of our own skins.”

Beck, Alan and Aaron Katcher. Between Pets and People: The Importance of Animal Companionship. West Lafayette: Purdue UP, 1996.

Quote 2: “Living as we do in a society where physical intimacy between adults is strongly repressed, at least in public, pets provide us with a valuable and socially acceptable outlet for the expression of intimate behavior.”

Serpell, James. In the Company of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996.


_______________________________________________


Artist 1:

Artist Name: Sage Sohier

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For her series Almost Grown
which deals with family, bonds, kinship and relations.


Image 1 of Artwork-

Sophie and Blair, Brookline, MA, 2006, photograph

Image 2 of Artwork-

Esha and Nisha, Southborough, MA, 2007, photograph

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: “I’m usually not a huge fan of straight forward portraiture, but
Sage Sohier’s series Almost Grown manages to strike a resonant emotional chord for me in spite of its stark simplicity. The series is comprised of images depicting parents posing with their on-the-cusp-of-adulthood children. The majority of the images create a visual triangle of spectatorial gazing, where in one of the subjects stares at the camera (and therefore at us, the viewer), while the other model gazes almost longingly at their familial partner in the image.

This not only creates a visually dynamic image, it also creates a physically dynamic experience for the viewer, who immediately feels personally involved in the obvious emotional connectivity taking place.

These images explore both the unbreakable connections between family members, and the necessity to at some point, and to a certain degree, sever those connections.”

Bibliography of Review: http://gaycondo.com jon: sage sogier’s “almost grown”. 23 August 2008.

Artist 2:

Artist Name: Phillip Toledano

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For his book, Days With My Father
. A poignant, emotionally charged and genuine book on a father-son relationship.


Image 1 of Artwork-

Title & dimensions unknown, taken between 2006-2009, photograph

Image 2 of Artwork-

Title & dimensions unknown, taken between 2006-2009, photograph

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: “To a very large extent, the value of a portrait is determined by its emotional contents: A photo of a person that moves us - in whatever way - has much more of an impact on us than one that leaves us cold. This aspect of portraiture is especially important for images of a photographer’s immediate family, where the artist’s task is to produce photographs that take the emotional qualities s/he knows very (often too) well and to share them with the viewers: The artist has to detach her/himself to some extent to avoid falling into the trap of sentimentality (or outright kitsch), while s/he can’t allow her/himself to become too detached.

If I remember the conversations with him correctly, Phil Toledano never set out to produce the body of work that became Days With My Father consciously; but that still doesn’t explain how he managed to produce a body of work that is so genuinely moving.

Ultimately, we might not even really need to know how he did it. There is something to be gained from not knowing everything, from keeping a little mystery here and there. What’s life without those mysteries?

What does matter is that the work is now available in book form, as an unassuming little book whose size and design mirrors the intimacy of the father-son relationship portrayed inside its pages. This needed to be a small book, something you can hold and handle easily, something inviting, something that despite its contents does not come across as too precious to be looked at over and over again. And you will look at it over and over again.

Days With My Father is the most poignant and moving book about a father-son relationship one could imagine. A true gem of a book.”

Bibliography of Review: Colberg, Joerg. Conscientious.com Review: Days With My Father by Phil Toledano. 4 June 2010.

Artist 3:

Artist Name: Niki Grangruth

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For the New Madonnas series for the exploration of mother and children relationship. It explores attachment, dependence and intimacy.

Image 1 of Artwork-

Soon After the Birth, 2009, photograph, dimensions unknown

Image 2 of Artwork-

Swaddling, 2009, photograph, dimensions unknown

THE NEW MADONNAS Artist Statement: This body of work explores the complex relationships between mothers and their children. These relationships are based on a series of emotional and physical juxtapositions – simultaneous connection and separation, intimacy and disengagement, reliance and independence, idealization and reality. I photograph middle class, American families in an examination of the tension between a historically constructed maternal ideal and the social reality of motherhood. I draw inspiration from traditional representations of the mother and child, specifically Madonna and Child imagery.

I use the home as a stage for domestic melodrama, constructing scenes that combine fictitious allegory and metaphor, historical maternal iconography, and observed events within the home. In combining traditional ideals and contemporary realities, I investigate the pervasiveness of maternal idealization, and the complexities and anxieties it creates for contemporary mothers.


Bibliography of Review: Grangruth, Niki. http://www.nikigrangruth.com/madonnasstatement.html


Artist 4:

Artist Name: Doug DuBois


Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For his Family Photos series. He explores what it means to be subject to personal relationships as well as the stress and complexity of family relations.

Image 1 of Artwork-

Family Photos, 1984-1992, photograph, dimensions unknown

Image 2 of Artwork-

Family Photos, 1999-2006, photograph, dimensions unknown

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: “Doug DuBois takes us into his own family's home to ponder the alienation and intimacy that prevails through a series of powerful portraits of his parents, siblings, nephew, as well as still-lifes and interior scenes. The occasional photograph taken outside the family domain heightens the sense of enclosure and of something inexorable. DuBois is the sincere but unseen seer, and it is of course his absence/presence that puts (perhaps at some personal risk) the private realm and the bonds of affection under such intense scrutiny.

DuBois does not chronicle family history nor record the rituals of family life, the holidays and birthdays and so forth. To be sure, we catch a glimpse of a Christmas past, but we only see the decorations before the wreckage and after. Each photograph in the series is its own, and the course of events is not so much what concerns DuBois, as the unfolding flow of discrete mundane moments, the fleeting gestures, and the oblique vantage points - in the way which we spend most all our days and nights.”


Bibliography of Review: Higher Pictures. Doug DuBois: All the Days and Nights
. 19, October, 2009.

Artist 5:

Artist Name: Justine Reyes

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For her Home, Away From Home series. I like this work for the domestic comfort, the idea of home and family and the complexity of relationships. I really liked the idea of recreating a piece of home where we go.

Image 1 of Artwork-

Al with Eye Patch, photograph, dimensions and year unknown

Image 2 of Artwork-

Late Night Conversation, photograph, dimensions and year unknown

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview:


Bibliography of Review: Reyes, Justine. http://justinereyes.com/ Home, Away From Home
.

Artist 6:

Artist Name: Diana Schmertz

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: I love these images for their ability to convey closeness, the human condition, emotion, and empathy.
Image 1 of Artwork-

They Are Each Other For A While, oil on canvas, 48x48 inches, 2010
Image 2 of Artwork-

Without Intention, oil on canvas, 36x30 inches, 2010

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: Composed primarily of close-up images of physical contact between people, my paintings are an investigation of the self and the other. Each work depicts somatic sensation, an experience of physical sentiment in a pre-verbal, visceral space. The fragmentation of these moments of contact lends ambiguity to both the pictorial space of the composition and to the boundary between the people portrayed. The application of paint is sensual conveying an intimacy rooted in connectedness and the interrelation of beings.

I use white (empty) space and geometric elements juxtaposed with organic imagery to simultaneously represent different approaches in exploring the distinction between the self and the other. In works such as “The Space Between, (wall piece),” I cover the entire surface of the wall with a grid of one-inch circular paintings of moments of physical contact. This compositional structure forces the viewer to make a choice. From afar the work appears to be a unit that references objectivity via mathematical order and scientific observation. At close range the viewer engages at a highly intimate and personal level. The inability to interact with the work from both perspectives in the same time and space echoes our struggle to understand human connections within the personal limitations imposed by the constraints of our physical being.

Bibliography of Review: Schmertz, Diana. http://www.dianaschmertz.com/statement.html 2010

Artist 7:

Artist Name: Allan King

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For his documentary A Married Couple
. It presents an intimate portrait of a marriage in conflict and the emotional devastation and loneliness their relationship has created.


Image 1 of Artwork-

Photograph for promotion of film, 1969


Image 2 of Artwork-

Movie still from A Married Couple, 1969

To view trailer: http://www.allankingfilms.com/couple.html

To view excerpt: http://www.documentaryclass.com/2008/05/married-couple.html


Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: “After six years of marriage, the point of all the arguments really is: Who is going to dominate whom? "I'm completely bewildered," Billy says toward the end of the film. "It seems that every time we get on some plateau of understanding, the next minute we are kicking and screaming."

Throughout "A Married Couple," which opened yesterday at the Kips Bay, it's perfectly apparent that Billy and Antoinette are playing to the camera, in moments of anger, intimacy and even boredom. It may be no accident that both of them were, at earlier stages in their lives, aspiring actors who never made it. The unreality prompted by the camera's presence is acknowledged in the film, which then proceeds to pass off this conscious performance as some kind of meta-truth that is neither fact nor fiction.

What King ultimately proves, I think, is that something that is neither fact nor fiction is less meta-truth than sophisticated sideshow. As I've never believed there is a novel in everybody, nor even a tape-recorded book, I now am convinced there are probably very few people worthy of being the subjects of an actuality drama. Better than any other instrument, perhaps, the documentary camera can capture the sense and feeling of events, of social climates, and even of people in public crisis, but meaningful private drama must always elude it since the camera is stopped by what Arthur Miller once called "the wall of the skin."

Bibliography of Review: Canby, Vincent. A Married Couple Screen: Elusive Reality: ‘A Married Couple,’ by Allan King, Opens. http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9D0CE3D81E39EE34BC4B53DFB466838B669EDE 3 February 1970.

Artist 8:

Artist Name: Colleen Rudolf

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For her Connect series. She constructs an interactive installation where the audience is encouraged to participate and be a determining factor in the work’s life. Consisting predominantly of sculptural objects, the included pieces attempt to explore various methods of communication. Using the animal kingdom and modern technology as inspiration, the viewer is challenged to consider exactly what it means to “connect” to another entity.

Image 1 of Artwork-

Inguinal Sniff, 2010


Image 2 of Artwork-

A Moment (front), and Cellular Phones on the back pedestal, 2010, sculpture

Image 3 of Artwork-

Elephant Feet, 2010, sculpture

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: “
Visitors to Colleen Rudolf‘s exhibit “CON · NECT [KUH · NEKT]” at the Grizzly Grizzly Gallery might feel as though they’ve stepped into a Please Touch Museum for the thinking adult. Rudolf is both perceptive and playful in contrasting animals’ straightforward and instinctual manner of relating to each other with humans’ inability to give our full attention to any single interaction. Rudolf believes that humans’ lack of focus is a recent development, due to the barrage of technological communication to which we are increasingly exposed.

The theme of Rudolf’s exhibit is illustrated most clearly in a series of three works on pedestals. On one pedestal is A Moment, a delicately wrought sculpture of two penguins facing each other. On the pedestal on the opposite end is Cellular Phones, two cell phones standing so close together that they, too, seem to be huddled in intimacy.

All of the show’s interactive works require two participants, and therefore facilitate the direct interaction Rudolf admires. My favorite of the interactive pieces, Elephant Feet, gives participants a chance to literally step inside an animal’s “shoes.” While one person steps up and down while wearing a pair of rubber-and-Styrofoam elephant boots, the person wearing the other pair feels vibrations on the soles of their feet. This mimics an actual method of communication among elephants based on seismic vibration.

In a final allusion to humans’ reliance on multiple forms of communication, Rudolf has provided laminated sheets of instructions at the gallery’s entrance. While some of the instructions are helpful, most are tongue-in-cheek. Take, for example, the diagrams explaining that one should look at the sculptures rather than swatting them off their pedestals. Rudolf’s point is clear: Are we so unused to direct, intuitive interaction that we need a set of instructions to understand works of art?”

Bibliography of Review: Kantor, Becca. Shapes and Animals at Tiger and Grizzly
. Theartblog.org 11 April 2010.

Artist 9:

Artist Name: Alec Soth

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: For his Niagara series. He examines love, happiness, expectations, disappointment and relationships in this body of work.

Image 1 of Artwork-

Michele and James 2004, photograph, dimensions unknown

Image 2 of Artwork-

Candlelight Hotel 2004, photograph, dimensions unknown

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: “
Soth’s photography is firmly rooted in the tradition of Walker Evans, Robert Frank, and Stephen Shore. His depiction of the everyday confronts the ideals romanticized by American society; independence, freedom, religious devotion and individual expression. Through his 8 x 10 camera lens, Soth captures the extraordinary by exposing and utilizing the vernacular of the ordinary.

NIAGARA both reinforces and undermines modern myths, focusing on true love, sexuality and the promise of “happily ever after.” Throughout NIAGARA Soth emphasizes various motifs associated with romance, ranging from newlywed bliss to heart-broken agony, the innocent and sacred to the perverse. His subjects include coupled nudes, individual and familial portraits, hand-written letters, motels and other staples of love and love lost in all its manifestations.”


Bibliography of Review: Gagosian Gallery. Alec Soth: Niagara
. 21 January 2006.

Artist 10:

Artist Name: Marina Abramović

Paragraph Explanation of Reason for Choosing this artist: She gives the audience the ability to participate one on one with her in her work, which allows for a more personal and intimate experience.

Image 1 of Artwork-

The Artist Is Present, performance, 2010


Image 2 of Artwork-

The Artist Is Present, performance, 2010

http://www.moma.org/explore/multimedia/videos/96/567

Outside Review of Artwork/Interview: “This performance retrospective traces the prolific career of Marina Abramović with approximately fifty works spanning over four decades of her early interventions and sound pieces, video works, installations, photographs, solo performances, and collaborative performances made with Ulay (Uwe Laysiepen). In an endeavor to transmit the presence of the artist and make her historical performances accessible to a larger audience, the exhibition includes the first live re-performances of Abramović’s works by other people ever to be undertaken in a museum setting. In addition, a new, original work performed by Abramović will mark the longest duration of time that she has performed a single solo piece. (Please note: Abramović will not perform during MoMA Nights.) All performances, one of which involves viewer participation, will take place throughout the entire duration of the exhibition, starting before the Museum opens each day and continuing until after it closes, to allow visitors to experience the timelessness of the works. A chronological installation of Abramović’s work will be included in The Joan and Preston Robert Tisch Gallery on the sixth floor of the Museum, revealing different modes of representing, documenting, and exhibiting her ephemeral, time-based, and media-based works. The exhibition is accompanied by an illustrated catalogue that includes an audio recording of the artist’s voice guiding the reader through the publication.”


Bibliography of Review: Marina Abramović: The Artist Is Present. http://www.moma.org/visit/calendar/exhibitions/965 14 March, 2010.

9/23/10

9/23/10 Thursday Post Pt. 2


Animals Die, People Ponder

Stories of people who handle dead animals. Don't worry — it's not as gross as it sounds. In fact, not disgusting at all. A story by George Saunders about an animal control man who falls in unrequited love. A woman who studies illuminated manuscripts, whose pages look like paper but are in fact animals. And other stories.

Death

"In my job, you can't just throw animals around. People will complain. You have to respect people's feelings about animals. Be more funeral director than garbage man."
Hicks, Clarence. Animals Die, People Ponder. Act 3 Dead Animal Man. http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/51/animals-die-people-ponder

"She was appealing to live."
Brillo, Leo. Animals Die, People Ponder. Act 4. January 24, 1997. http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/51/animals-die-people-ponder

"
It's sort of amazing how the guy sees his job -- as just that, a job. Most of us see dead animals on the shoulder, and we ignore it or we play roadkill bingo. I think maybe most of us don't know what to make of this fact that to have the infrastructure we do in this country, all these animals are run over. It's just the way it is, the way it's been, so it's accepted as a necessary evil. I like that the veteran points out the idea that maybe the Earth isn't just for humans. I also enjoyed how the guy working goes from Grim Reaper to Angel, and then back to just a person doing a job, an undertaker. That's what he is for these animals, but maybe he does feel like he's returning some sense of dignity to them."
Vincent, Matthew. Review of Dead Animal Man (Clarence Hicks) April 22, 2007. http://www.prx.org/pieces/60-dead-animal-man

Dead Animal Pick Up

The Bureau of Sanitation collects dead animals free of charge, except for horses and cows. (For horses and cows, please check your local yellow pages for a rendering service.)

Could make for a potentially interesting photograph to follow a sanitation worker on house calls to collect dead pets from their owners. Would seem to make an emotionally charged image.

Poem by John Updike "Dog's Death"

She must have been kicked unseen or brushed by a car.
Too young to know much, she was beginning to learn
To use the newspapers spread on the kitchen floor
And to win, wetting there, the words, "Good dog!
Good dog!"

We thought her shy malaise was a shot reaction.
The autopsy disclosed a rupture in her liver.
As we teased her with play, blood was filling her skin
And her heart was learning to lie down forever.

Monday morning, as the children were noisily fed
And sent to school, she crawled beneath the youngest's bed.
We found her twisted and limp but still alive.
In the car to the vet's, on my lap, she tried

To bite my hand and died. I stroked her warm fur
And my wife called in a voice imperious with tears.
Though surrounded by love that would have upheld her,
Nevertheless she sank and, stiffening, disappeared.

Back home, we found that in the night her frame,
Drawing near to dissolution, had endured the shame
Of diarrhea and had dragged across the floor
To a newspaper carelessly left there. Good dog.

Updike, John. Collected Poems: 1953-1993. Knopf Publishing. 1995.




9/23/10 Thursday

Paul McCartney and his English Sheepdog Martha

"Martha My Dear"

Martha my dear though I spend my days in conversation
Please remember me Martha my love
Don't forget me Martha my dear

Hold your head up you silly girl look what you've done
When you find yourself in the thick of it
Help yourself to a bit of what is all around you
Silly Girl.

Take a good look around you
Take a good look you're bound to see
That you and me were meant to be for each other
Silly girl.

Hold your hand out you silly girl see what you've done
When you find yourself in the thick of it
Help yourself to a bit of what is all around you
Silly girl.

Martha my dear you have always been my inspiration
Please be good to me Martha my love
Don't forget me Martha my dear.

9/21/10

Wafaa Bilal Visit Summary


I really enjoyed Wafaa Bilal's visit. I found him to be incredibly generous, intelligent and down to earth. I presented him with my ongoing project about people and their pets, Rudiments of Thought and Joy Untroubled. He expressed interest in the subject matter and asked me a lot of questions regarding my personal connection to the work and questions that challenged the nature and meaning of the work.

Some of the questions he raised were Is this work about the human-animal relationship? Is it really just about the pet owner? Is it about the animal at all? Is this work a self portrait? Do pet owners mimic their pets and not the other way around?

Some issues we discussed included vulnerability, comfort, companionship, domestication, class level, personal issues, pets and owners mirroring one another, etc. He challenged me to really figure out what this work is about. Is it really about the relationship/companionship between a pet and an owner? Is it about the pet owner solely? Is it about the pet? Could this be a project of self portraiture?

Bilal made a suggestion to examine the breech of contract when animals/pets are abandoned by humans (on an individual level as well as a community) who are responsible for domesticating and therefore caring for them. While I was not really into that idea because I don't want to make a political statement or critique on society, (not to mention it would broaden this work to such a degree when I really want to focus in on very specific avenues of the pet culture), I could see myself exploring that issue in a separate project in the future. Bilal mentioned, as he also did in his talk, Adorno. He reminded me that everything is political. Even in trying to make something unpolitical, you are creating politics. While, at this point, I'm not ready to take the project to a darker side, Bilal did give me some great things to think about and ponder. I thoroughly appreciated his visit, criticisms, and his speech.

I shared with Bilal the next big image that I want to conquer which he seemed into. There are about 10 universities in the US that have pet friendly dorms. College students can actually bring their pets to live on campus, in a dorm, with them. This new trend is fascinating as it raises all kinds of issues revolving around pet restrictions, safety, fear, comfort zone, strict guidelines and rules, liability and responsibility. I would like to explore this new phenomena and hopefully gain access to photograph one of these dorms and their residents.

9/19/10

9/20/10 Monday




Keith Carter

These images were selected from his book, Heaven of Animals. I think these images present the human/animal relationship very well. It displays emotion and attachment and intimacy.

BIO:
Keith Carter is an internationally recognized photographer and educator. Born in Madison, Wisconsin in 1948,he holds the endowed Walles Chair of Art at Lamar University Beaumont, Texas. He is the recipient of two National Endowment for the Arts Regional Survey Grants and the Lange-Taylor Prize from The Center for Documentary Studies at Duke University. In 1997 Keith Carter was the subject of an arts profile on the national network television show, CBS Sunday Morning. In 1998, he received Lamar University's highest teaching honor, the University Professor Award, and he was named the Lamar University Distinguished Lecturer.
Eight monographs of his black and white photographs have been published: From Uncertain To Blue, 1988; The Blue Man, 1990; Mojo, 1992; Heaven of Animals, 1995; and Bones, 1996. A mid-career survey, Keith Carter Photographs - Twenty Five Years was published in 1997; Holding Venus and his eighth book, Ezekiel's Horse, were published in 2000.
"Called "a poet of the ordinary" by the Los Angeles Times, Mr. Carter's haunting, enigmatic photographs have been widely exhibited in Europe, The U.S., and Latin America. They are included in numerous permanent collections, including the Art Institute of Chicago; the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art; the George Eastman House; the Museum of Fine Arts of Houston; and the Wittliff Collection of Southwestern and Mexican Photography at Southwest Texas State University."

QUOTES:

"Keith was trying to express ineffable things now, things like his love of music and myth and mystery, things like the internal lives of animals, things like those fragments of universality that can sometimes be gleaned from between the lines of great poetry. The resulting photographs were not so much asking you to observe, as before – now they were inviting you to participate, to open the door and come on in.

Look at “Garlic” or “Giant” or “Alice;” look at “Cosmos” or “Luna” or “Horse and Wolf” or “Holding Venus” or “Sky and Water”…It’s not that these pictures are telling you things you didn’t already know, but rather that – like “Fireflies” – they’re reminding you of things you’ve deep down always known but somehow forgotten, because life has a nasty habit of simply becoming too daily, too dependent on thought at the expense of feel. These photographs fill you up and become a part of your inner life, depending on the depth of your own capacities. The proof is that the first response to the best of Keith’s images – and to all great art – is almost always an instant YES, and instant recognition of that which was already there inside you on some profound connecting thread that runs through the very core of all of us as fellow travelers on this spinning globe. That’s how great art in any medium slips past all boundaries of time and space and cultural differences to deliver the goods."
(Courtesy of Bill Wittliff, Austin,Texas)
Wittliff, Bill. Keith Carter Photographs. http://www.keithcarterphotographs.com/biography.html

"So, in addition to his pictures of people, when Carter photographs a dog (he's done many), a horse (ditto), or even some flowers in a vase or a dress hanging on a wall, he does it in a way that sweetly connects the viewer to the subject and warmly holds you close to it."
Brickman, David. Get Visual. http://dbgetvisual.blogspot.com/2010/01/keith-carter-at-esther-massry-gallery.html

http://www.keithcarterphotographs.com/dvd.html


Howard Greenberg Gallery
41 East 57th St. Suite 1406
New York, New York 10022

9/15/10

9/15/10 Thursday


Jon and I briefly mentioned this in class on Tuesday. Very interesting...

During the annual Blessing of the Animals at St. John the Divine Cathedral, the congregation might include any animal from Noah's ark. Why do these pet owners bring their furry, feathery and scaly companions to church? (Oh yeah, and view our slideshow of our day at the Cathedral).

Next. A whale rescue. A motley crew of divers and fishermen set out to free a whale, and are convinced they encountered a definitive moment of cross-species communication. Dr Clive Wynne isn't so sure. To make his point, Dr. Wynne tells us about a study by Dr. Alexandra Horowitz, who talks to producer Soren Wheeler about the science behind dog guilt.






"Over the last two decades increasing evidence for an acute sensitivity to human gestures and attentional states in domestic dogs has led to a burgeoning of research into the social cognition of this highly familiar yet previously under-studied animal. Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) have been shown to be more successful than their closest relative (and wild progenitor) the wolf, and than man's closest relative, the chimpanzee, on tests of sensitivity to human social cues, such as following points to a container holding hidden food. The “Domestication Hypothesis” asserts that during domestication dogs evolved an inherent sensitivity to human gestures that their non-domesticated counterparts do not share. According to this view, sensitivity to human cues is present in dogs at an early age and shows little evidence of acquisition during ontogeny. A closer look at the findings of research on canine domestication, socialization, and conditioning, brings the assumptions of this hypothesis into question. We propose the Two Stage Hypothesis, according to which the sensitivity of an individual animal to human actions depends on acceptance of humans as social companions, and conditioning to follow human limbs. This offers a more parsimonious explanation for the domestic dog's sensitivity to human gestures, without requiring the use of additional mechanisms. We outline how tests of this new hypothesis open directions for future study that offer promise of a deeper understanding of mankind's oldest companion. "

Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2010). What did domestication do to dogs? Biological Reviews. 85, 327-345.

UF researcher gets inside the mind of man's best friend

above article from St. Petersburg Times



9/14/10

TED lecture: Paul MacCready on nature vs. humans



Paul MacCready on nature vs. humans | Video on TED.com

Paul MacCready looks at a planet on which humans have utterly dominated nature, and talks about what we can do to preserve nature's balance.

"Now human related to animals: look at what I call the human portion -- humans and their livestock and pets -- versus the natural portion -- all the other wild animals-- these are vertebrates and all the birds, etc. in the land and air, not in the water. How does it balance? Well, certainly 10,000 years ago, the civilization's beginning, the human portion was less than one tenth of one percent. Let's look at it now. Humans, livestock and pets are now 97 percent of that integrated total mass on earth and all wild nature is three percent. We have won. The next generation doesn't even have to worry about this game -- it is over. And the biggest problem came the last 25 years: it went from 25 percent up to that 97 percent. And this really is a sobering picture in realizing we, humans, are in charge of life on earth, we're like the capricious Gods of old Greek myths, kind of playing with life, and not a great deal of wisdom injected into it. "

I thought it interesting how much domestication the human has actually performed. Its staggering when you see the growth charts. We, humans, are responsible for this huge shift. And we are responsible for the well being of the animals we've domesticated as well as being stewards of the natural world that we've capitalized on.





9/13/10

TED lecture: Tony Robbins

Tony Robbins asks why we do what we do | Video on TED.com

(maybe a cheesy, petty choice but thought it worked on some level)

Tony Robbins discusses the "invisible forces" that motivate everyone's actions. The 2 invisible forces at play are: 1) our state (physical and emotional) and 2) our model of the world/world view: the shaper of meaning, emotion and action. What is our motive for action? What is it that shapes us? Tony believes it is emotion that is the force of life. And the invisible force of internal drive, activated, is the most important thing in the world. Tony concludes that there are 6 human needs (not goals or desires) that are universal: 1) certainty, 2) uncertainty, 3) significance, 4) connection and love, 5) growth and 6) contribute beyond ourselves. We all have the same needs but are all driven by different ones. Robbins encourages the audience to explore their own web- the needs, the beliefs, the emotions that are controlling them. And also to understand and appreciate what drives other people.

I think that the universal human needs that Robbins lists can be used to explain why we seek out our relationships, be it friendship, romance, etc. I also think it helps to explain why people become pet keepers... why they seek out a relationship with an animal(s). The human-animal bond can offer certainty (pets can offer certainty that people can avoid pain and at least be comfortable with the pet), we need uncertainty (pets offer variety, surprise and spontaneity), significance (our pets can make us feel important, special and unique), connection and love (we want it. We can get it through intimacy, friendship, prayer, walking through nature, or even a pet), growth (we bond and grow with our pets over time. If we aren't growing or a relationship isn't growing, we feel like hell. We grow in order to give something of value) and finally, contributing beyond ourselves (its not about me, its about we. Contributing to our pets and the relationship we have with animals. i.e. walking your dog, brushing your cat, training your dog to be a therapy animal to others, volunteering at your local animal shelter, etc.)

How would you define the 2 invisible forces at play (1. physical/emotional state & 2. world view) in pet keepers?

What is it that drives people to be pet keepers?